Light versus Electricity versus Sound in Switching off Neurological Diseases
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
Neurological diseases, ranging from Parkinson’s and epilepsy to chronic pain and depression, remain a major medical challenge, often resistant to conventional pharmacological treatments. Emerging evidence suggests that alternative modalities such as light, electricity, and sound can modulate neural circuits, offering promising strategies to “switch off” pathological activity. Phototherapy and optogenetics allow targeted neuronal activation or inhibition using light-sensitive proteins, while electrical stimulation—including deep brain stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation—modulates neural excitability and network dynamics. Similarly, sound-based approaches, including focused ultrasound and vibrotactile neuromodulation, influence brain activity non-invasively. This article examines the comparative potential of these modalities, highlighting their mechanisms, advantages, and limitations in managing neurological disorders. While each technique shows promise, their optimal application may involve complementary strategies tailored to disease-specific circuits. Advancing these interventions requires rigorous research, ethical considerations, and translational studies to harness the full potential of light, electricity, and sound in restoring neurological health.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Neuromodulation, Optogenetics, Deep Brain Stimulation, Ultrasound Therapy, Neurological Diseases
No funding source declared.
Deisseroth, K. (2015). Optogenetics: 10 years of microbial opsins in neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience, 18(9), 1213–1225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4091
Fisher, R., Salanova, V., Witt, T., Worth, R., Henry, T., Gross, R., … SANTE Study Group. (2010). Electrical stimulation of the anterior nucleus of thalamus for treatment of refractory epilepsy. Epilepsia, 51(5), 899–908. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02536.x
Fomenko, A., Neudorfer, C., Dallapiazza, R. F., Kalia, S. K., & Lozano, A. M. (2018). Low-intensity ultrasound neuromodulation: An overview of mechanisms and emerging human applications. Brain Stimulation, 11(6), 1209–1217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2018.08.013
George, M. S., Wassermann, E. M., & Williams, W. A. (2010). Daily repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) improves mood in depression. Neuroreport, 6(14), 1853–1856.
Hamblin, M. R. (2016). Shining light on the head: Photobiomodulation for brain disorders. BBA Clinical, 6, 113–124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbacli.2016.09.002
Krook-Magnuson, E., Armstrong, C., Bui, A., Lew, S., Oijala, M., & Soltesz, I. (2015). In vivo evaluation of the dentate gate theory in epilepsy. The Journal of physiology, 593(10), 2379–2388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1113/JP270056
Tyler W. J. (2011). Noninvasive neuromodulation with ultrasound? A continuum mechanics hypothesis. The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry, 17(1), 25–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858409348066
Tyler, W. J., Lani, S. W., & Hwang, G. M. (2018). Ultrasonic modulation of neural circuit activity. Current opinion in neurobiology, 50, 222–231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2018.04.011
World Health Organization. (2022). Neurological disorders: Public health challenges. https://www.who.int
Yizhar, O., Fenno, L. E., Davidson, T. J., Mogri, M., & Deisseroth, K. (2011). Optogenetics in neural systems. Neuron, 71(1), 9–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.06.004
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.