Risks in Online College Student Lending in China and Coordinated Regulation
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
Since its introduction to China in 2007, online lending has witnessed a boom, aided by the impetus of internet development. Due to the peculiarities of the borrowers, online college student loans facilitated by peer-to-peer lending platforms have sparked widespread public concern. Many issues plague online lending operations for college students, including unclear duties of the platform, immature approval and exit regulations, interest rates, and fee structures; knowledge asymmetry in the transaction; and false publicity of the platform for profiteering purposes. As a result, internet lending risks are increasing, including credit risk, usury risk, and information leakage risk. The objective of this research was to provide implications for risk avoidance and action by exploring the causes of these risks and describing the current governance of online student lending.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Online Lending Platform, P2P Lending for College Students, Risk Prevention, Financial Regulation
2. Li YL. Governance of college student loan in the context of information asymmetry. Higher Educ Forum 2021; 2021(1):81-84+106.
3. Guo WX. Prevention of risks in online student lending. J Juven Delinq Prevent 2020; 2020(4):82-89
4. Renmin University of China. The report of “Research on Chinese College Students’ Understanding of Credit.” School of Finance, Renmin University of China. 2015. Available at: http://sf.ruc.edu.cn/info/1073/1612.htm
5. Zhu D. Credit consumption of college students and risks in online student lending. Youth Stud 2019; 2019(6):49-59+92
6. Wu HQ, Cheng XY. Problems with online student lending and countermeasures from the perspective of risk society. Contemp Youth Res 2018; 2018(1):106-111
7. Sina Finance. The Disappearance of Youyi, the online lending platform with investors losing more than 20 million CNY. 2013. Available at: http://finance.sina.com.cn/china/jrxw/20130110/142214247156.shtml
8. Cao H. Operation mechanisms, types of infringement and varied governance of non-performing online student lending platforms. J Shenzhen Univ (Human Soc Sci Ed) 2020; 37(1):120-128
9. Cao H, Pan Y. Chaotic online student lending, the regulatory system, and universities’ responses. J Shanxi Univ Finan Econ 2019; 4(S1):47-51
10. Yao HF. The revised legal system of online finance regulation. Polit Sci Law 2018; 2018(12):12-22
11. National Internet Finance Association of China. Relevant laws, regulations, and cases of P2P online lending platforms. Beijing: China Financial Publishing House. 2016.
12. Tu GZ. Regulation of online college student lending in the context of the application of big data. Times Finan 2020; 2020(29):134-136.
13. Yang JX. The legal regulation of the risk in unlawful fund-raising of P2P online loan platforms in China. Beijing: Law Press China. 2020.
14. Wan KF. Online student lending models and legal regulation. Chin Econ 2017; 2017(8):233-234+236
15. Lai LH. Defects in China’s online lending regulatory system, harms, and improvement paths. J Nanchang Univ (Human Soc Sci Ed) 2016; 47(6):76-83
16. Li CY. An analysis of the text of China’s student loan governance policies. Higher Educ Forum 2020; 2020(9):69-73
17. Online Lending Network. The Annual Report of China’s Online Lending Industry 2019. Available at: https://www.wdzj.com/news/yc/5568513.html
18. China Economic Network. The emergence of new scams of “cancellation of college student online loan accounts” 2020. Available at: https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1682747357354501931&wfr=spider&for=pc
19. Chen Z. It is imperative to improve the credit reporting system amid the increased bad debts. 2018. Available at: http://iof.hexun.com/2018-07-31/193616890.html
20. Li Y. “Unlawful industrial chains” deriving from “loans for beauty services”. Chin Qual Promot 2020; 2020(2):26-28.
21. Feng G, Jiang SS. Deviation of China’s P2P online lending platforms and its regulation. Stud Law Bus 2013; 30(5):29-37.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.