Pedagogical Practice of Process-Oriented Writing Instruction Based on Intelligent Writing Platforms: A Case Study of the Applied Writing Course
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
Applied writing courses in higher education hold strong pedagogical value due to their genre normativity and practical orientation but often face challenges like limited process guidance, delayed teacher feedback, and insufficient opportunities for revision. The emergence of generative artificial intelligence has introduced intelligent writing platforms as novel instructional tools, yet their pedagogical functions, implementation models, and potential risks in the classroom setting, especially as perceived by teachers, remain underexplored. Situated in the context of an applied writing course, this study investigates the role and significance of intelligent writing platforms for process-oriented writing instruction from teachers’ perspective. Adopting qualitative case study design, the research involved six university instructors who participated in the pedagogical practice. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews focusing on the teachers’ perceptions of intelligent writing platforms, instructional changes, and the benefits, challenges, and risks they perceived. The analysis centered on identifying and interpreting shared teaching experiences across the instructor group rather than emphasizing individual-level differences. The findings reveal that teachers largely adopt a cautiously positive stance, treating intelligent writing platforms as auxiliary scaffolding tools. When integrated into the pre-writing, writing, and post-writing stages, these platforms facilitate a transition from product-focused to process-oriented writing instruction. At the same time, their application prompts critical reflections on issues regarding writer agency, instructional design complexity, and assessment authority. The study suggests that the pedagogical value of intelligent writing platforms depends on teacher guidance within clearly defined instructional goals and boundaries.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Intelligent Writing Platforms, Applied Writing, Process-Oriented Writing, Human–AI collaboration
This study is funded by the project “A Practical Reform of Process-Oriented Writing Instruction Based on an Intelligent Writing Platform: A Case Study of the Applied Writing Course” (2025JGA425) under the 2025 Guangxi Higher Education Undergraduate Teaching Reform Program.
Aljuaid, H. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence tools on academic writing instruction in higher education: A systematic review. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on ChatGPT, 26-55. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/ChatGPT.2
Alzubi, A. A. F. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence in the EFL writing context: Students' literacy in perspective. Qubahan Academic Journal, 4(2), 59-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v4n2a506
Chen, L., & Zheng, S. (2025). The application of generative artificial intelligence in teaching Chinese writing as an international language. E-Education Research, 46(9), 122–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2025.09.015
Li, J., Zong, H., Wu, E., Wu, R., Peng, Z., Zhao, J., ... & Shen, B. (2024). Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence to enhance the writing of English academic papers by non-native English-speaking medical students-the educational application of ChatGPT. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05738-y
Lin, X. F., Shen, W., Huang, S., Wang, Y., Zhou, W., Ling, X., & Li, W. (2025). Exploring Chinese teachers’ concerns about teaching artificial intelligence: The role of knowledge and perceived social good. Asia Pacific Education Review, 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-024-10034-x
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
Liu, H. (2025). Exploring Chinese writing instruction under a human–machine collaborative model: A case study on enhancing argumentative writing depth in senior high schools. Shanghai Research on Education, 2025(10), 83–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16194/j.cnki.31-1059/g4.2025.10.002
Liu, M., Zou, W., Zong, M., & Yang, B. (2025). How generative artificial intelligence empowers teaching: An empirical study of English writing instruction among secondary school students. China Educational Technology, 2025(6), 70–79.
Ni, J. (2025). The supportive role and risk prevention of artificial intelligence in professional applied writing instruction. Chinese Character Culture, (23), 175–177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14014/j.cnki.cn11-2597/g2.2025.23.040
Noonen, S., & Baek, J. (2024). Exploring the integration of generative AI in modern writing pedagogy: Trends and implications for education. Journal of the Korean Association of Computer Education, 27(4), 193-210. https://doi.org/10.32431/kace.2024.27.4.015.
Rad, H. S., Alipour, R., & Jafarpour, A. (2024). Using artificial intelligence to foster students’ writing feedback literacy, engagement, and outcome: A case of Wordtune application. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(9), 5020-5040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2208170
Shang, K. (2025). Reform and innovation of applied writing instruction in higher vocational education under the background of artificial intelligence. Journal of Liaoning Higher Vocational Education, 27(6), 62–65.
Utami, N. W., Sagita, L., Rahmawati, R. D., & Nurdianto, H. (2024). Cultural Change of Mathematics Teachers' Views on Technology: Navigating the Artificial Intelligence Revolution. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 8(2), 149-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29099/ijair.v8i2.1232
Wang, J., Kamaljiang, M., & Yang, Y. (2023). The symbiotic human–machine composite mind: Development and model innovation of generative artificial intelligence–assisted writing instruction. Journal of Distance Education, 41(4), 37–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15881/j.cnki.cn33-1304/g4.2023.04.004
Wang, Q. (2025). Artificial intelligence–driven innovation in creative writing instruction. Chinese Literary Criticism, 2025(3), 147–153, 160.
Wang, Z. (2022). Computer-assisted EFL writing and evaluations based on artificial intelligence: a case from a college reading and writing course. Library Hi Tech, 40(1), 80-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-05-2020-0113
Yu, H., & Guo, Y. (2023, June). Generative artificial intelligence empowers educational reform: current status, issues, and prospects. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 8, p. 1183162). Frontiers Media SA.
Zhang, C. (2025). Some challenges and future prospects for teachers in the context of artificial intelligence. Pacific International Journal, 8(4), 65-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55014/pij.v8i4.848
Zhu, L. (2024). The value, impact, and implications of ChatGPT for Chinese writing instruction. Teaching and Management, 2024(15), 63–66.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.